The Hundred-Year Language

Hi, this entry will talk about an article titled: “The Hundred-year language”, written by Paul Graham. Basically, it discusses how computer languages (and programming languages) are going or may be in 100 years. 
The author started with a curious and, in my opinion, a great comparison saying that in the same way as species, the languages (including computer or programming languages) form a kind of evolutionary tree, where some of them end as dead-ends branches. A clear example is Cobol that, despite its past popularity, it doesn’t seem to have any descendant, fact that automatically converts it in an evolutionary dead-end branch. I bet that in the great Cobol days, nobody thought that it won’t evolve, nor have descendants, nor be commonly used.

Then, the author talked about something really controversial speaking about programming languages: the supposed success of the Java language. I think that Java it’s the most known programming language and for many people the better programming language out there. Clear evidence of this is how an undergraduate student thinks that, in order to get a job or to have success later in his professional life, he has to know the Java language. 
I agree with the author that Java will end as Cobol, another dead-end branch in the programming languages evolutionary tree. Because, being honest, Java has a lot of problems and that has allowed many programming languages to grow more and better, clear examples are Python or TypeScript.

It is supposed that a programming language with a simple core, will increase its long-term survival. But is this true? We are not sure of it, we don’t know how the hardware is going to be in 100 years, or how the software is going to be coded, or if there are going to be a new “perfect” programming language. We can’t ensure that the only thing we know is that technology evolves according to human necessities and what we think nowadays, may be totally different in the future.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ruby and the Interpreter Pattern

Hi, today's entry is going to talk about an article written by our professor Ariel Ortiz. The article/paper is titled “Language Design and Implementation using Ruby and the Interpreter Pattern “. After reading this paper, I realized some things. First of all, I got really impressed that this paper explains a framework used to teach in a course, in my actual university, that I already took. Second, in the title the Interpreter Pattern is mentioned and actually in another course (from which I also write a blog weekly) we are treating design patterns. It’s important to mention that I’m taking that course now and it is with the same professor.  Basically, The S-expression Interpreter Framework (SIF) is explained in this article as a tool for teaching language design and implementation concepts. This interpreter was written in Ruby to help us, the students, to learn a popular object-oriented dynamic language and language design and implementations concepts. But here is the curious poin
Read more

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

Hi, today’s entry is going to talk about this course book called “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” published in 1979 by Douglass Adams. This book is literally a journey through space. The main character Arthur Dent escaped from the Earth with Ford Prefect (the actual writer for the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy) because it was going to be destroyed. Arthur and Ford escaped on a Vogon ship (the ones who destroyed the Earth), but they were blasted into space and caught by another ship piloted by Zaphod Beeblebox, the king of the universe. That ship was both stolen and special because it has the “improbability drive” that literally functions as it sounds, with improbability. Thanks to that ship ability they arrived at a legend planet called Magrathea, where they found all the truth. That planet was the home of a computer built to find the answer to the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. Guess what? The answer is 42 and the Earth was another super-computer built t
Read more

Technical Overview of the CLR

Hi, today’s entry is going to talk about an article called “Technical Overview of the Common Language Runtime (or why the JVM is not my favorite execution environment) written by Erik Meijer and Kim Miller in 2001. Basically, it talks about how in the past years, some language researchers moved to JVM as kind of the delivery vehicle for their language. We know that JVM is a really good target for the Java programming language, but it is not necessarily a good platform for other languages (making an emphasis in the ones that require semantic features that do not appear in Java). And here is when and why the author introduces to us the new Microsoft .NET Common Language Infrastructure (or CLI), designed from the ground to be a multi-language platform.  I want to mention one thing that seemed curious to me, the authors of this paper are Microsoft members (or at least that’s what I saw in their emails at the start of the article). This aspect made me think that obviously, as the authors
Read more